RomRaider Logo

RomRaider

Open Source ECU Tools
 FAQ •  Register •  Login 

RomRaider

Documentation

Community

Developers

It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2025 7:22 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Any Sort of "userlevel" support for RR Logger?
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:39 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Developer

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:49 pm
Posts: 7314
Location: Canada eh!
ecubyteindex="CF48D" is not valid. This causes the Logger to scan the supported PID index (received from DEBUG [Thread-6] - ECU Init Response <--- ) to look for a True value at this byte/bit location.

You will need to use the format:
Code:
<ecuparam id="ZS1" name="~ High Octane 0 / Regular 1" desc="bfREGGAS" target="1">
  <ecu id="CF48D">
    <address bit="6">0xFF23AC</address>
  </ecu>
  <conversions>
    <conversion units="On/Off" expr="x" format="0" gauge_min="0" gauge_max="1" gauge_step="1" />
  </conversions>
</ecuparam>


PS: RR will be switching to the 6 character CAL ID / ECU ID in the next release. The "1" dropped from the beginning of all will be required in future definitions, i.e.: 1CF48D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Sort of "userlevel" support for RR Logger?
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:11 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:35 am
Posts: 789
Location: United States of America
Ahhh. No work around there then haha I really appreciate you taking the time to answer all my questions! :) Thank you once again for all the help!

Thanks for the heads up on the ECU ID portion! I definitely want to get a head start on changing the format for my current defs haha Is the only thing that needs to be changed the ecuid and internalidstring portion of the definition file? Or do you also need us to change the xmlid and .xml file name as well?

_________________
NissanDefinitions Repository


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Sort of "userlevel" support for RR Logger?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:24 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Developer

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:49 pm
Posts: 7314
Location: Canada eh!
I would suggest replacing all instances of the CAL ID/ECU ID with the new version in XML files. File names do not matter though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Sort of "userlevel" support for RR Logger?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:52 pm 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 11:07 pm
Posts: 652
dschultz wrote:
PS: RR will be switching to the 6 character CAL ID / ECU ID in the next release.


Hi dschultz, can you elaborate on this ?
SID 1A does add that leading '1' for some unfathomable reason, but Nissan seems to use the 5-char version pretty much everywhere : part numbers, repro file / TSB lookups (i.e. from https://www.nissan-techinfo.com/ ), even those factory-supplied .dat repro files internally refer to the 5-char version only...

_________________
If you like nisprog + npkern, you can support me via https://liberapay.com/fenugrec/
For sending me encrypted/secure messages, use PGP key 0xBAC61AEB3A3E6531 available from pool.sks-keyservers.net


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Sort of "userlevel" support for RR Logger?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 5:53 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Developer

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:49 pm
Posts: 7314
Location: Canada eh!
OBD Mode 09 04 reports the full 6 characters of CAL ID. Because this Logging mode is not manufacturer specific I have to use the full 6 characters to be compatible across all. This forces the use of all 6 characters, as some definitions are common once the ECU ID is known. You can leave the XML ID as a 5 character code if you wish.
Attachment:
obd.png
Attachment:
ecuid.png


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Sort of "userlevel" support for RR Logger?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 7:32 pm 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 11:07 pm
Posts: 652
dschultz wrote:
Because this Logging mode is not manufacturer specific I have to use the full 6 characters to be compatible across all.

Fair enough. Thanks for the explanation !

In any case, I'm not maintaining RR nor the definitions anymore, so it actually doesn't matter to me, hehe.
I imagine "our" (Nissan) def naming will keep the 5-char convention but change the xml tag needed for logger integration.

_________________
If you like nisprog + npkern, you can support me via https://liberapay.com/fenugrec/
For sending me encrypted/secure messages, use PGP key 0xBAC61AEB3A3E6531 available from pool.sks-keyservers.net


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style based on FI Subsilver by phpBBservice.nl