Fearless wrote:
A good log viewer can show you an hour of data as a trace on a screen, though. You shouldn't really have to sift through it line by line.
Yes I worked with this viewers also (DIAdem , FARMOS e.g.), but if you got not quick zoom function and a ascii-based log-file, you will not handle this kind of logs
Quote:
You don't need 100 samples per second for this 12.5 minute process. As requested 1 or 2 samples per sec is sufficient.
This exactly is the point.
Look a a temperature bahaivor also does not need 100 samples a second
BR
