|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Fuel Injector Scaling Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:10 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
Currently using STi pinks.
I can't seem to find the magic number  No matter what I do, it seems like, as soon as the intake temps get hotter, the AF Learning goes down to -12% to -15%
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Jon [in CT]
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:34 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:19 pm Posts: 650 Location: Connecticut, USA
|
|
What do you have for injector scaling? The JDM ECUs scale them at 528.73 cc/min.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:52 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
i have them at 552.02 at the moment...
i can never remember  what's the rule of thumb, high negative AF learning, lesser injector scale?
Jon [in CT] wrote: What do you have for injector scaling? The JDM ECUs scale them at 528.73 cc/min.
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:37 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:14 pm Posts: 768
|
|
If AF Learning is +XX% then you are LEAN and need to LOWER the Injector Scaler.
If AF Learning is -XX% then your are RICH and need to RAISE the Injector Scaler.
I just tossed my Pinks in last night and they are working great. I get about +/- 5% so far.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:21 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
what number scale are you using?
ev8siv3 wrote: If AF Learning is +XX% then you are LEAN and need to LOWER the Injector Scaler.
If AF Learning is -XX% then your are RICH and need to RAISE the Injector Scaler.
I just tossed my Pinks in last night and they are working great. I get about +/- 5% so far.
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:31 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:14 pm Posts: 768
|
|
The standard 528.73 scaling from the JDM cars and matches the C0BB scaling for the pinks as well.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:37 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
i tried using that value and the af learning dips down to -15.63%
ev8siv3 wrote: The standard 528.73 scaling from the JDM cars and matches the C0BB scaling for the pinks as well.
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:00 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
|
also, when cruising, what should be the values on AF learning? crusing around, i'm seeing constant values of 10% to 14% - makes me think the injectors are working too hard.
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:04 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:14 pm Posts: 768
|
ProjectWRX wrote: also, when cruising, what should be the values on AF learning? crusing around, i'm seeing constant values of 10% to 14% - makes me think the injectors are working too hard.
It should be within +/- 10%. The ECU is able to correct up to 25% but in reality you'd want it all to fall within 3-5% either direction. If it's +10% then lower your Injector Scaler by 5%.
(Injector Scaler / 1.05) = New Scaler
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:06 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
i'll try that as soon as I get off work. stupid sunday work.
ev8siv3 wrote: ProjectWRX wrote: also, when cruising, what should be the values on AF learning? crusing around, i'm seeing constant values of 10% to 14% - makes me think the injectors are working too hard. It should be within +/- 10%. The ECU is able to correct up to 25% but in reality you'd want it all to fall within 3-5% either direction. If it's +10% then lower your Injector Scaler by 5%. (Injector Scaler / 1.05) = New Scaler
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
akira350z
|
Post subject: Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:08 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:00 pm Posts: 237
|
ev8siv3 wrote: If AF Learning is +XX% then you are LEAN and need to LOWER the Injector Scaler.
If AF Learning is -XX% then your are RICH and need to RAISE the Injector Scaler.
I just tossed my Pinks in last night and they are working great. I get about +/- 5% so far.
Ahhh Glad to see this!!
I recently am trying to scale my modded stock injectors correctly.
I had them at 750cc and over a period of about 5 days the learning would be about 15% and my tune would be way lean!
I then tried 775cc...got lean right away quick...tried 725cc = a bit better...tried 680cc and now it's a LOT better, the learning is about 4%!
Imagine that, modded stockers scaled to only 680cc who would have thought...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jabbott
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:02 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:17 am Posts: 44 Location: Staten Island, NY
|
|
I have my modded injectors scaled to 650. My LT fuel trims are around -2. These injectors were just returned from whitchhunter for cleaning and flow. They flowed @ 900cc! So I think the new injector calculation in the defs is a little off, but in the end it doesn't really matter. Just set it till your fuel trims are good.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
IWantMeAJojo
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:05 am |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 363 Location: Montgomery, AL
|
i was concerned as well about the numbers - but after talking to jared about it, he said there's nothing to worry about it. scale it accordingly 'till you reach the desired curve.
jabbott wrote: I have my modded injectors scaled to 650. My LT fuel trims are around -2. These injectors were just returned from whitchhunter for cleaning and flow. They flowed @ 900cc! So I think the new injector calculation in the defs is a little off, but in the end it doesn't really matter. Just set it till your fuel trims are good.
_________________ Boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
xolosis
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:26 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:27 pm Posts: 70 Location: Australia
|
ev8siv3 wrote: If AF Learning is +XX% then you are LEAN and need to LOWER the Injector Scaler.
If AF Learning is -XX% then your are RICH and need to RAISE the Injector Scaler.
I just tossed my Pinks in last night and they are working great. I get about +/- 5% so far.
Not disagreeing but I'm confused as over at NASIOC I got the opposite information see here http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthr ... ?t=1070281 under Jon [in CT] post. Here is a snippet...
" Log A/F Learning #1. It's value is a percentage. If it's positive, increase the injector scale by that percentage. If it's negative decrease injector scale by that percentage. Repeat."
Just want to make sure we get the right information!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:43 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:14 pm Posts: 768
|
|
Well.. Take a look at both statements, then determine if Logic A makes more sense than Logic B.
Make the injector scaler bigger and you inject less fuel.
Make the injector scaler smaller and you inject more fuel.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|