RomRaider Logo

RomRaider

Open Source ECU Tools
 FAQ •  Register •  Login 

RomRaider

Documentation

Community

Developers

It is currently Sat Feb 21, 2026 3:52 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 07 sti rom analysis
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:37 am 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:38 am
Posts: 5336
Been looking at the 07 sti rom more closely and verifying the current defs which were preliminary. Some interesting findings:

1. There was the big hubbub about all the extra tables that these roms had. Like 6 boost and fuel maps, etc. However, some of these extra tables are effectively disabled in the rom. For example, instead of 6 boost maps, only 2 are ever used (same as the other 32bit roms which will be similarily updated in the upcoming ecu def release). Same with some of the other tables as well (fuel 6 to 4, initial wg 6 - 2, etc.)

2. Knock correction was removed from SSM logging for all the 07 models. IAM was added to SSM for the 07 sti (haven't checked the wrx, though). The knock correction logic appears to the same however and therefore knock correction as a parameter can be added to the logger (I will also have an upcoming logger xml update with this and other updates included).

3. Some new tables unique to the 07 sti - Boost Compensation (Intake Temp) and Boost Compensation (Atmosphere). Other 32bit roms also have boost compensation based on atmospheric pressure but they use AP multiplier and offset to determine the multiplier, whereas the 07 sti is simplier with a standard 2d compensation table (the appropriate table will be added to the defs for all 32bit roms).

4. AF learning #1 range on every other 32bit ecu is -15% to 15%, whereas the 07 sti is -25% to 25%.

5. These roms are actually very similar to the A8DH... series instead of the 06 sti. There is very little difference in the logic except for timing and throttle duty. Timing compensation is similar, but base timing\advance determination is strange. Anything involving throttle duty is also quite different. I haven't had a chance to look at these in detail but it might require some volunteer loggers to really see what is going on.

6. It also has the logic introduced on later 05 LGT models where wgd as determined by the initial\max tables is ignored at times and instead wg duty is ramped up from a minimum value until it hits the map target determined by the initial\max tables. Although the limits are different on the 07 sti and it is possible that the wacky wg behavior is disabled. I'll have to look at it closer. If it isn't disabled, it might explain some of the hesitation issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:47 am 
Offline
RomRaider Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Let me know where I can help out.

-Gabe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 3:50 pm 
Offline
Experienced

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:41 pm
Posts: 483
Location: toggle switch envy, PA
I have heard over on the legacy board that the 07 heads have 1mm bigger valves, but cannot confirm this anywhere else.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:51 pm 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:34 pm
Posts: 839
Location: Putnam, CT
I had asked about this on another board when clark turner was around....
this is what I got.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo_Mike
Rumor has it that there were some slight porting/chamber changes that subaru didnt tell anyone about, thus the different stock power rating and the different response to mods, but I havent seen one apart to tell either way. I'm sure you would know more than me about it dave, have you checked part #'s or anything??

__________________
Quote:
clark and i had this same discussion--he saw a 07 sti engine apart and looked at the heads and they looked the same as always--i thought they were different also.i wish they had the cam design of the 06-07 wrx.
dave

_________________
Turbo Mike Tuning
Charlton, MA
AWD Mustang Dyno


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:09 pm 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:55 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Tulsa, OK
I have an 07 STI and don't mind logging if it will help the cause. Just let me know what you want and I'll run it whenever I'm driving.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 4:27 am 
Offline
Experienced

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:47 pm
Posts: 145
I have been reaching a limit with the 07.

It appears that there is a limit associated with 4.5Volts on the MAF.

With the factory boost control system it looks like a torque limiting map that cuts the WDC when the MAF limit of 4.5 is reached. I tested this on two differently set up STi's using factory boost control. I thought it was a hard WDC cut limit and put a different solenoid on the car. It exceeded the 4.5 long enough for the ecu to learn the solenoid and quickly fixed the airflow by cutting WDC even more. I was very suprised at how fast it did this. I have not yet tested a manual boost controller to see if it will cut other parameters to help control torque.

I confirmed the existence of a desired torque map with some COBB and EcuPuke tuners (I actually have friends!!!). There is a desired torque map that is a 3d map and a MAF limit setpoint.

I am really very very inexperienced at this .hex .xml stuff.
I am willing to learn and contribute as much as I can in between my two jobs.

I own an 07 STi and have access to 3 others.

Oh and I forgot to add, I used pretty much every map available via RomRaider to see any of them affected the results. The MAF limit and MAX Load didn't do anything for this.

_________________
http://www.getadomtune.com

Professional Tuning Services
Advice and Guidance
Monthly ROM and Log review


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:00 am 
Offline
RomRaider Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
ImprezaRSX wrote:
I confirmed the existence of a desired torque map with some COBB and EcuPuke tuners (I actually have friends!!!). There is a desired torque map that is a 3d map and a MAF limit setpoint.


That might xplain a few things and support my conspiracy theory. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:13 am 
Offline
RomRaider Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
My WB is coming in this week. So I can do even more testing, not that testing fuel is that important, but... Helps to have one. There is more and more evidence of subaru just limping this thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:39 am 
Offline
Experienced

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:47 pm
Posts: 145
i have stock roms and I have a rom in .bin form from the ecuT*k guys.

_________________
http://www.getadomtune.com

Professional Tuning Services
Advice and Guidance
Monthly ROM and Log review


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:41 am 
Offline
Experienced

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:47 pm
Posts: 145
got any advice?

I got a hex editing and bin editing program but I don't know what ANY of the features are.
I don't even understand hex.
I kinda get the numbering system.. but that's it.

Please, let me know what I can do to help.

_________________
http://www.getadomtune.com

Professional Tuning Services
Advice and Guidance
Monthly ROM and Log review


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:49 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 8:04 am
Posts: 40
are the 06 affected also by this "torque control" map?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 11:24 am 
Offline
RomRaider Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
ImprezaRSX wrote:
got any advice?

I got a hex editing and bin editing program but I don't know what ANY of the features are.
I don't even understand hex.
I kinda get the numbering system.. but that's it.

Please, let me know what I can do to help.


Wait till Bill gets up and see what he says bout it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 12:58 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:38 am
Posts: 5336
ImprezaRSX wrote:
I have been reaching a limit with the 07.

It appears that there is a limit associated with 4.5Volts on the MAF.

With the factory boost control system it looks like a torque limiting map that cuts the WDC when the MAF limit of 4.5 is reached. I tested this on two differently set up STi's using factory boost control. I thought it was a hard WDC cut limit and put a different solenoid on the car. It exceeded the 4.5 long enough for the ecu to learn the solenoid and quickly fixed the airflow by cutting WDC even more. I was very suprised at how fast it did this. I have not yet tested a manual boost controller to see if it will cut other parameters to help control torque.

I confirmed the existence of a desired torque map with some COBB and EcuPuke tuners (I actually have friends!!!). There is a desired torque map that is a 3d map and a MAF limit setpoint.

Ok, I'll take a look at it. I'm pretty sure I can find it - no need for Cobb or Ecutek maps as I don't want to be accused of stealing their work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:05 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
I caught it this morning. Right when it hit the limit. Post up log in a sec. Its hard to tell though in the log that anything is wrong, but you can see boost lowers a bit, and you can definitely feel it right around 5.6k rpm when MAF hits 250. No timing pulled (at least it looks smooth) but the power just kind of cuts out like it pulled timing.

Edit, actually there was some timing pulled at 4700, I need to look at the KC Map. This happened right after Peak load though. I doubt it was due to knock.

EDIT: It was not pulling timing, map called for that KC. Timing advance C and D call for that drop. Timing advance B does not.

EDIT again: I did feel the drop in power at 4700 (the KC map called for it, WTF), but then again 5600 (where timing looks fine and smooth).


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Last edited by gabedude on Wed May 02, 2007 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:02 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Developer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
scotty wrote:
are the 06 affected also by this "torque control" map?


No, the 07 STI ECU (and parts) are very different.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style based on FI Subsilver by phpBBservice.nl