|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:13 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
|
I have mishimoto performance intake with oiled air filter and mishimoto turbo inlet, maf housing is 2.75 inch with welded mesh. After maf rescale, all maf open loop area numbers are about 14% less than stock, so at 4.69v I hit about 256 g/s. How is it possible? Is it because of the short ram intake I pressure tested all post turbo intake up to 1.2 bar, everything seemed normal, only hear a little sound inside intake manifold
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jon7009
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 2:46 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:31 pm Posts: 1529 Location: oregon
|
|
How exactly are you rescaling the MAF?
_________________ if you're generous, feel free to donate. venmo @ jon7009, 1047 when asked jedilley@gmail.com for paypal
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:30 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
jon7009 wrote: How exactly are you rescaling the MAF? Usually using maf scale software. But I couldn't hit my target afr, so I decided to do it otherwise. During wot I was running about 9.3, my target 10.8, I calculated percentage and lowered scale by this % and started to hit my targets. I'm using wideband to monitor afrs. Injectors are stock, so I didn't rescaled them
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jon7009
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 12:45 pm |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:31 pm Posts: 1529 Location: oregon
|
|
what is the internal diameter of the area that the MAF sensor is in? do you have pics of where and what the size of the air straightener is?
it's possible that is how your MAF setup wants to work, if you're using a screen mesh similar to window screen you're cutting down on the potential flow overall, as that sort of mesh is restrictive.
_________________ if you're generous, feel free to donate. venmo @ jon7009, 1047 when asked jedilley@gmail.com for paypal
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:23 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
jon7009 wrote: what is the internal diameter of the area that the MAF sensor is in? do you have pics of where and what the size of the air straightener is?
it's possible that is how your MAF setup wants to work, if you're using a screen mesh similar to window screen you're cutting down on the potential flow overall, as that sort of mesh is restrictive. Diameter is 2.75" I will try to attach photos of the intake
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:25 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:27 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
|
Here is pic from mishimoto web
| Attachments: |

MMAI-WRX-01P_1.png [ 222.87 KiB | Viewed 4344 times ]
|
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jon7009
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:44 pm |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:31 pm Posts: 1529 Location: oregon
|
|
that design looks like it would scale weird and probably have AFR drift with IAT swings
I'd vote stock intake over that intake.
_________________ if you're generous, feel free to donate. venmo @ jon7009, 1047 when asked jedilley@gmail.com for paypal
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 6:54 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
jon7009 wrote: that design looks like it would scale weird and probably have AFR drift with IAT swings
I'd vote stock intake over that intake. It's really weird, all maf scale in closed loop is a bit higher than stock, but open loop area is a lot smaller. I plan to switch to SD in the summer
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jon7009
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 3:39 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 10:31 pm Posts: 1529 Location: oregon
|
|
if you look at the cross section of the diverter / straightener area, at low flow it should have more air over the sensor
and at higher flow it looks to be restrictive
thus, higher g/s at low voltage and lower g/s at high voltage
if your software is scaling the sensor and your fueling error is getting within 1% everywhere, then you're for sure doing it right - just that this intake isn't going to work for anything more than a TD04 with it's stock voltage axis.
Send me a PM with your current MAF scale, or post it here, and I can set you up with a polynomial derived starting point for a MAF scaling with a shifted voltage axis to reach higher in the MAF scale.
_________________ if you're generous, feel free to donate. venmo @ jon7009, 1047 when asked jedilley@gmail.com for paypal
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
andea79
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 5:53 am |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:27 pm Posts: 494 Location: Romania
|
kareston wrote: jon7009 wrote: that design looks like it would scale weird and probably have AFR drift with IAT swings
I'd vote stock intake over that intake. It's really weird, all maf scale in closed loop is a bit higher than stock, but open loop area is a lot smaller. I plan to switch to SD in the summer you probably have a leak ...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:07 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
andea79 wrote: kareston wrote: jon7009 wrote: that design looks like it would scale weird and probably have AFR drift with IAT swings
I'd vote stock intake over that intake. It's really weird, all maf scale in closed loop is a bit higher than stock, but open loop area is a lot smaller. I plan to switch to SD in the summer you probably have a leak ... I pressure tested all post turbo pipes. As I wrote in the 1st post. Post maf leak, it would have been lean during wot, but I was really rich, target afr 10.8, during wot afr was 9.3
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:08 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
jon7009 wrote: if you look at the cross section of the diverter / straightener area, at low flow it should have more air over the sensor
and at higher flow it looks to be restrictive
thus, higher g/s at low voltage and lower g/s at high voltage
if your software is scaling the sensor and your fueling error is getting within 1% everywhere, then you're for sure doing it right - just that this intake isn't going to work for anything more than a TD04 with it's stock voltage axis.
Send me a PM with your current MAF scale, or post it here, and I can set you up with a polynomial derived starting point for a MAF scaling with a shifted voltage axis to reach higher in the MAF scale. Thanks. I already scaled maf up to 4.96 volts
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
kareston
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:10 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:24 pm Posts: 65 Location: Klaipeda. Lithuania
|
|
My boost is 1.5 bar. Fuel trims +-2% at idle area, after that it stays 0%. Might be dirty maf sensor? Thought about it only now
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
andea79
|
Post subject: Re: SRI maf scale. Need advice Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 2:20 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:27 pm Posts: 494 Location: Romania
|
|
leak after throttle plate, sucking air during vacuum hence the need for higher maf scale and losing air during boost hence the need for lower maf scale ... if you do maf scaling with a leak the fuel trims are irrelevant -> you are covering the leaks by scaling ...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|