|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 3:53 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
|
Would really enjoy fast rpm drops during spirited shifting situations.
Digging through RR the only things im finding would be to lower the timing advance at the lowest MAF cell (50 i think it is) for the entire rpm range in the RON files under the ignition category. Or under the deceleration category, retarding the timing more in the one section about TPS with A/C off (forget exactly what its called, no access to my laptop atm).
Any ideas? Am I way off?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pazi88
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:00 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 8:14 am Posts: 1042 Location: Oulu, Finland (English/Finnish)
|
323toslow wrote: Or under the deceleration category, retarding the timing more in the one section about TPS with A/C off (forget exactly what its called, no access to my laptop atm).
This! Edit the column for hottest temp so that the retard is -10 to -15 degrees and the rev hang is pretty much gone. Originally there is even positive values to acheive the rev hang. Apparently this is done because it will make gear chamges easier if you drive like a granny  Second thing I would recommend is to raise the min temp for antijerk to max value (143 degrees C or something). This makes the engine respond much quicker to fast thorttle movements. Which makes fast gear ghanges much more pleasing.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 11:11 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
|
Awesome thank you very much!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Enabled
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:09 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:53 pm Posts: 627 Location: Houston, TX
|
323toslow wrote: lower the timing advance at the lowest MAF cell (50 i think it is) for the entire rpm range This is how I prefer to do it at the moment, even though the deceleration map method works too. It seems that you get a very short and nice exhaust crackle on decel when editing the main ignition maps, lowest Load column. I typically do 18-20 degrees ignition advance for sane values.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:47 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
|
Will either of these methods make rpm drop immediately when clutch is in and throttle pedal is up?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
andrebrito88
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:24 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:10 pm Posts: 69
|
Enabled wrote: 323toslow wrote: lower the timing advance at the lowest MAF cell (50 i think it is) for the entire rpm range This is how I prefer to do it at the moment, even though the deceleration map method works too. It seems that you get a very short and nice exhaust crackle on decel when editing the main ignition maps, lowest Load column. I typically do 18-20 degrees ignition advance for sane values. Some guys use even negative -20 on the first column...this on renault so bmw probably same...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:31 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
|
Currently i have it as pazi88 mentioned, it definitely made revhang shorter, but it is still there slightly. Not a big deal but hey if it can be how i want it, let off the gas and push clutch in at the same time and rpm immediately starts falling, would be superb.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:18 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
|
Did negative 16.5 on the first (33) and second (50) MAF load column on both RON 91 and 98 tables from 1000 to 6500 rpm. Rev hang seems to be completely eliminated with that adjustment, but a new issue has occurred...maybe its a side effect? In neutral with the clutch out the car seems to be slowly dipping at idle, goes between 600ish to 720rpms. As soon as I push the clutch in it goes right to 720 and sits there.
Out of curiosity, anyone know where to look in the bin for what table(s) are dependent of the clutch switch?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pazi88
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 3:55 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 8:14 am Posts: 1042 Location: Oulu, Finland (English/Finnish)
|
|
There is one idle advance table at least for clutch switch but it's not defined in current RRdefinitions. But you could revert the changes in ignition map close to idle rpm to see if it has effect.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:26 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
pazi88 wrote: There is one idle advance table at least for clutch switch but it's not defined in current RRdefinitions. But you could revert the changes in ignition map close to idle rpm to see if it has effect. I reverted back and this weird car still does it but the rpm range goes back and forth from 720 down to 680ish instead of the previous 120 rpm bounce. Maybe something is up with the ICV.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Enabled
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:12 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:53 pm Posts: 627 Location: Houston, TX
|
pazi88 wrote: There is one idle advance table at least for clutch switch but it's not defined in current RRdefinitions. But you could revert the changes in ignition map close to idle rpm to see if it has effect. What is the german damos acronym for the clutch switch? In the old old days of MS42, people discovered that if they cut a wire on the clutch switch, all their rev hang went away.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:28 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
Are you hinting that cutting the clutch switch wire will eliminate revhang 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pazi88
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 12:56 pm |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 8:14 am Posts: 1042 Location: Oulu, Finland (English/Finnish)
|
Enabled wrote: pazi88 wrote: There is one idle advance table at least for clutch switch but it's not defined in current RRdefinitions. But you could revert the changes in ignition map close to idle rpm to see if it has effect. What is the german damos acronym for the clutch switch? In the old old days of MS42, people discovered that if they cut a wire on the clutch switch, all their rev hang went away. The map name is kf_zw_kup_swi_ll__tkw So kup_swi is clutch switch And if I remember correctly cutting clutch switch wires will cause dtc. Or at least non working cruise.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Enabled
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 4:48 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:53 pm Posts: 627 Location: Houston, TX
|
323toslow wrote: Are you hinting that cutting the clutch switch wire will eliminate revhang  Kind of.. but I don't approve of the method. But if the maps are known, it's another piece of the puzzle. https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/show ... -on-M52TUs photobucket has all the pictures now, unfortunately.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Enabled
|
Post subject: Re: Reducing revhang...is it possible? Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 4:49 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:53 pm Posts: 627 Location: Houston, TX
|
pazi88 wrote: Enabled wrote: pazi88 wrote: There is one idle advance table at least for clutch switch but it's not defined in current RRdefinitions. But you could revert the changes in ignition map close to idle rpm to see if it has effect. What is the german damos acronym for the clutch switch? In the old old days of MS42, people discovered that if they cut a wire on the clutch switch, all their rev hang went away. The map name is kf_zw_kup_swi_ll__tkw So kup_swi is clutch switch And if I remember correctly cutting clutch switch wires will cause dtc. Or at least non working cruise. Oh ya, that was easier than I made it seem in my head. Clutch = kupplung ... Thank you!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|