RomRaider Logo

RomRaider

Open Source ECU Tools
 FAQ •  Register •  Login 

RomRaider

Documentation

Community

Developers

It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2025 8:54 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Possible error in ecu def?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:26 am 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:38 pm
Posts: 5336
I have revision A4SGC00C (02 WRX). I noticed that Boost Target(MT) and Boost Target(AT) hex values in the ecu_defs.xml file (3-30) seem to be reversed when compared to the Tari offset file. I have an ecutek tune with boost switching, so it uses both the MT and AT maps for boost target and WDC% to switch maps. When looking at these with RomRaider, it looked like something was reversed as my valet map tables (MT) and main map tables (AT) and thier corresponding WDC% table didn't match up with their boost maps (that is, the valet map corresponded to the higher WDC% map).

Tari shows:

0x233FE (0x2B3FF - when I add 8001) : Target Boost Levels (Auto)
0x2346B (0x2B46C - when I add 8001) : Target Boost Levels (Manual)

The XML file shows:
+ <table base="Boost Target" name="Boost Target (AT)" storageaddress="0x2B46C">
+ <table base="Boost Target" name="Boost Target (MT)" storageaddress="0x2B3FF">

I'm a noob at this stuff, so I could have no idea what I'm talking about. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:20 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:33 pm
Posts: 2079
Location: Palo, IA
Sounds like you're probably right. I'll get that fixed and put it in with the next release.

Edit: Can you check the wastegate duty table too?

_________________
- Jared


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:53 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:38 pm
Posts: 5336
Wastegate duty table is A-OK.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:12 pm 
Offline
Experienced

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:14 pm
Posts: 768
I'll have to take a look at these after I finish up with the 04-05 stuff.. I noticed on the IDLE speeds I may have an AT/MT mixup as well.. I haven't even started on the 02-03.. Good catch.

Just change the name of the table From AT to MT and vice versa if the X/Y values are correct but the main storage addresses are backwards..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Carlosrsj23 and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style based on FI Subsilver by phpBBservice.nl