|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
wrxspeed
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:35 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:08 am Posts: 11
|
|
you hit the nail right on the head....as the rpm goes up theres is less of a chance to fully charge the coils, that is why you will see on stand alone ecu the m.s drops the higher the rpms.
ok how about engine starting tables like Cranking vs inj pulse Cranking vs coolant post start enrichment post start decay fuel pump prime..etc
Decel fuel cut would be sick that would explain why some cars will handle any B.O.V and some wont.
also i have a bounty on the knock treshhold for who ever finds it no disrespect for who have tried.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
elevenpoint7five
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:44 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:15 pm Posts: 316 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
wrxspeed wrote: you hit the nail right on the head....as the rpm goes up theres is less of a chance to fully charge the coils, that is why you will see on stand alone ecu the m.s drops the higher the rpms.
ok how about engine starting tables like Cranking vs inj pulse Cranking vs coolant post start enrichment post start decay fuel pump prime..etc
Decel fuel cut would be sick that would explain why some cars will handle any B.O.V and some wont.
also i have a bounty on the knock treshhold for who ever finds it no disrespect for who have tried. Are you asking for those tables? The knock threshold is not what you are hoping for. I assume you want to decrease the sensitivity of the knock sensor? I'm sorry but that isn't going to happen on the 16bit ecu. Perhaps something like this exists on the 32bit, but it does not exist on the 16bit. Andy
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
wrxspeed
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:22 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:08 am Posts: 11
|
elevenpoint7five wrote: wrxspeed wrote: you hit the nail right on the head....as the rpm goes up theres is less of a chance to fully charge the coils, that is why you will see on stand alone ecu the m.s drops the higher the rpms.
ok how about engine starting tables like Cranking vs inj pulse Cranking vs coolant post start enrichment post start decay fuel pump prime..etc
Decel fuel cut would be sick that would explain why some cars will handle any B.O.V and some wont.
also i have a bounty on the knock treshhold for who ever finds it no disrespect for who have tried. Are you asking for those tables? The knock threshold is not what you are hoping for. I assume you want to decrease the sensitivity of the knock sensor? I'm sorry but that isn't going to happen on the 16bit ecu. Perhaps something like this exists on the 32bit, but it does not exist on the 16bit. Andy yes i was asking if the tables are in there somewhere. the table you posted before looks just like the misfire treshold that Cobb has in there software.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
elevenpoint7five
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:31 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:15 pm Posts: 316 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
|
All of those tables are in the existing defs are they not? Decel fuel cut still needs some work, but I know it exists. And that is the misfire threshold table, but as I have no idea what the threshold means, I never defined it.
Andy
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mrf582
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 4:07 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:04 pm Posts: 2661 Location: RIP
|
dschultz wrote: Maybe you guys have seen this before, I just ran across it. It appears to be a test of the grey and black coil packs. Attachment: Subaru_coils.pdf Just to confirm for me, in the electronic ignition world, is this dwell time table the amount of time the primary coil circuit is de-energized to release the flux into the secondary coil? If I did my calculation correctly on a 4 cylinder engine a single spark plug is sparking every 'x' msec at these RPM. Code: RPM msec 500 240 1000 120 3600 33.33 8000 15 So at 8000rpms if you run 5ms of dwell time like you 'can' on the grey coils, then you have 10ms of cooldown time. Weren't the early UTECs blowing coils on the early cars? I imagine they had the older black coils though which according to that document can only handle 3ms. Eitherway, the factory thinks ~12.5ms of cooldown time is enough at 8000rpm on grey coils. How far can we push that?
_________________ MS41 Project Leader & Co-Developer (2012 - 2023) MS41.3 https://sites.google.com/site/openms41/custom-code---ms41-3 MS41 ECU Portal https://sites.google.com/site/openms41/ms41-ecu-portal
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
SVT_WRX
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:40 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:35 pm Posts: 39
|
|
Hmmm....In regards to the .pdf, I'm assuming this means don't run no more than 3ms. I'm wondering if I should just put in a flat 3ms or just slightly less across the board. Thoughts?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Sasha_A80
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:31 pm |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:31 pm Posts: 1615 Location: Moscow, Russia
|
|
Slightly more across the board. The lower RPM the longer. You need some extra period just in case for engine acceleration. From the other hand the ignition power circuit has 7-9 amps current limiter in order to protect coils and driver outputs.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
legaulois
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:18 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:59 am Posts: 77 Location: France
|
|
For AZ1G201G, AZ1G202G and AZ1G2000
X Axis D45EC Y Axis D462C Table D4640
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Subeboost
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:19 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:33 am Posts: 182
|
|
2008+ WRX/STi uses FK0334 coil packs. They look identical when compared to older FK0186 model.
It would be great to see how the dwell times looks like. Any info?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Subeboost
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:37 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:33 am Posts: 182
|
legaulois wrote: For AZ1G201G, AZ1G202G and AZ1G2000
X Axis D45EC Y Axis D462C Table D4640 Those are not working for me..
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dschultz
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:51 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Developer |
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 1:49 am Posts: 7323 Location: Canada eh!
|
|
What ROM are you looking at this for?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Subeboost
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:50 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:33 am Posts: 182
|
|
2008+ WRX/STi rom stock roms found on scoobypedia for example. I am trying to figure out FK0334 coil pack dwell table.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Subeboost
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:55 am |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:33 am Posts: 182
|
I think that I found out that the newer FK0334 coil pack dwell time is the same as the older FK0186 coil. This is what I came up with.. 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
wrxspeed
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:38 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:08 am Posts: 11
|
elevenpoint7five wrote: wrxspeed wrote: BTW cobb has a missfire treshold table base on RPM and load Does it look something like this? The numbers are probably different as I haven't applied an expression to that, but I'll bet it follows that pattern huh?  Attachment: misfire.JPG Andy Hey Andy is there a way that i can add the above table to any 02-05 wrx rom?..... it can help out alot with the fake missfires due to big cams on low loads.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
legaulois
|
Post subject: Re: Ignition Dwell - New Definitions Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:13 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:59 am Posts: 77 Location: France
|
|
AZ1J500G
X Axis - D4CF0 Y Axis - D4CB0 Table - D4D04
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|