|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Jeramie
|
Post subject: Waste Gate Duty - Higher Than Mapped Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:12 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:05 pm Posts: 774 Location: PA, USA
|
|
Recently I've been noticing my Waste Gate Duty in my logs is regularly over what I have mapped in RomRaider. From what I understand this is not supposed to possible. Is the def I have wrong (the one that comes with RomRaider as of now?). Thanks
_________________ Enjoy,
Jeramie
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Re: Waste Gate Duty - Higher Than Mapped Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:15 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:14 pm Posts: 768
|
Jeramie wrote: Recently I've been noticing my Waste Gate Duty in my logs is regularly over what I have mapped in RomRaider. From what I understand this is not supposed to possible. Is the def I have wrong (the one that comes with RomRaider as of now?). Thanks
It also uses the compensation maps to achieve your target boost levels. Think of it as Base Timing + KC. Only for boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
qoncept
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:16 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:33 pm Posts: 2079 Location: Palo, IA
|
|
Check the WG duty compensation tables.. They may be raising it a bit. Is it significantly higher than what you've got in your max wg duty table?
_________________ - Jared
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Jeramie
|
Post subject: Re: Waste Gate Duty - Higher Than Mapped Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:24 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:05 pm Posts: 774 Location: PA, USA
|
ev8siv3 wrote: Jeramie wrote: Recently I've been noticing my Waste Gate Duty in my logs is regularly over what I have mapped in RomRaider. From what I understand this is not supposed to possible. Is the def I have wrong (the one that comes with RomRaider as of now?). Thanks It also uses the compensation maps to achieve your target boost levels. Think of it as Base Timing + KC. Only for boost.
I figured there was compensation tables, but when inquiring, I was told that they are only used to lower WGD (maybe I missunderstood)?
Weird part is my WGD matches what the old RomRaider says!
_________________ Enjoy,
Jeramie
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Jeramie
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:27 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:05 pm Posts: 774 Location: PA, USA
|
|
I took a look at compensation tables, but they don't seem to make any sense to me? Can someone elaborate?
For instance. The attached map. 68F - 86F means 50 (but 50 what? 50% increase in WGD?)
| Attachments: |

Comp.jpg [ 11.35 KiB | Viewed 4947 times ]
|
_________________ Enjoy,
Jeramie
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
qoncept
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 4:51 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:33 pm Posts: 2079 Location: Palo, IA
|
|
Ok, that makes it sound like the definition file IS the problem. Your car is an 04, right?
_________________ - Jared
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Jeramie
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:00 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:05 pm Posts: 774 Location: PA, USA
|
|
Yes it is an 04. Let me know if you need any info.
_________________ Enjoy,
Jeramie
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:32 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:14 pm Posts: 768
|
Jeramie wrote: I took a look at compensation tables, but they don't seem to make any sense to me? Can someone elaborate?
For instance. The attached map. 68F - 86F means 50 (but 50 what? 50% increase in WGD?)
What this means is that the wastegate is allowed an additional X% to achieve target boost if target boost is not achieved with the BASE values. All of these compensation maps co-mingle with eachother to achieve your boost.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
crazymikie
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:05 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:27 pm Posts: 226
|
|
That map is not consistent with the maps I've seen.
The compensation removes duty cycle <= 50 degrees and leave the duty cycle alone above there- at least with the stock values.
Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ev8siv3
|
Post subject: Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:23 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:14 pm Posts: 768
|
crazymikie wrote: That map is not consistent with the maps I've seen.
The compensation removes duty cycle <= 50 degrees and leave the duty cycle alone above there- at least with the stock values.
Mike
Could be, don't change any other settings and set the values at 68F and 86F to 0 and see what happens. Then try 100 and see. Experimentation is key to tuning and discovery.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|