|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
janithdg
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:45 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:57 pm Posts: 262 Location: Sri Lanka
|
ahmedsalem89 wrote: janithdg wrote: Can you post a log, personally i havnt dont an ms41.2 conversion to an e39, as with the e39 have a few can bus connections and ms41.2 never came in an e39, did you try ms41.1 to see if you have the same issue? I can do a log later today and post it here, and no i haven't tried 41.1. I did 41 to 41.2 directly. would an ABS sensor function test using INPA help? also I have done logging before using RR logger on the MS41, would i need to change logger definitions for the 41.2? Check for all asc/abs errors as in e39 vehicle speed is only taken from abs Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ahmedsalem89
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:50 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:08 am Posts: 11
|
janithdg wrote: ahmedsalem89 wrote: janithdg wrote: Can you post a log, personally i havnt dont an ms41.2 conversion to an e39, as with the e39 have a few can bus connections and ms41.2 never came in an e39, did you try ms41.1 to see if you have the same issue? I can do a log later today and post it here, and no i haven't tried 41.1. I did 41 to 41.2 directly. would an ABS sensor function test using INPA help? also I have done logging before using RR logger on the MS41, would i need to change logger definitions for the 41.2? Check for all asc/abs errors as in e39 vehicle speed is only taken from abs Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I already did and there are no errors anyways I will double check, do a log and get back to you thanks for helping me out man
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ahmedsalem89
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:22 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:08 am Posts: 11
|
janithdg wrote: Check for all asc/abs errors as in e39 vehicle speed is only taken from abs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok i checked for errors in the abs module and there are none I did a function test for all 4 abs sensors using inpa and they all showed 6 mph while i was going 10 kph so its fine Then i started logging ising romraider logger it still shows inaccurate speed Please see attached log of a very short drive i did early this morning of a maximum speed of 45ish kph
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
janithdg
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:34 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:57 pm Posts: 262 Location: Sri Lanka
|
ahmedsalem89 wrote: janithdg wrote: Check for all asc/abs errors as in e39 vehicle speed is only taken from abs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ok i checked for errors in the abs module and there are none I did a function test for all 4 abs sensors using inpa and they all showed 6 mph while i was going 10 kph so its fine Then i started logging ising romraider logger it still shows inaccurate speed Please see attached log of a very short drive i did early this morning of a maximum speed of 45ish kph what is the value you have for vehicle speed correction?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ahmedsalem89
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:02 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:08 am Posts: 11
|
janithdg wrote: what is the value you have for vehicle speed correction? I flashed ba114 Partial (328i ID41 to MS41.2 - partial) after flashing MS41.2 stock full in ba114 partial the vehicle speed correction value is 6185
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ahmedsalem89
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 5:10 pm |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:08 am Posts: 11
|
ahmedsalem89 wrote: janithdg wrote: what is the value you have for vehicle speed correction? I flashed ba114 Partial (328i ID41 to MS41.2 - partial) after flashing MS41.2 stock full in ba114 partial the vehicle speed correction value is 6185 Ok after changing to 1185 the problem is almost gone. There is still a little bit of difference i think i should lower it more. Can it be set to zero? Thank you janithdg, ba114 and everyone contribuiting to this forum. Edit: I set it to 685 and no it shows 190 kph while going 120 kph lol I just need to find the appropriate value. Edit 2: I don't want to flood the thread with lots of posts but now I'm getting the gearbox error to light up in the dash once a day reading error using INPA shows : 152 Engine torque reduction (DME) Error Frequency : 1 Label Byte 21 Output speed Torque Reduction EGS Plausibility --- --- --- --- Reading errors using Torque and ELM327 show: P1519 [BMW] A camshaft position actuator Bank 1 Car is 1996 E39 520 with an M52B28 swap and a Jatco auto gearbox
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
328i-sport-rossi
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 5:58 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 11:58 am Posts: 478
|
|
I have been running my MS41.2 Tune along with using the ms41.2 knock table set up.
I recently amended the knock tables to that of the ms41, i seem to now have knock.
would this suggest the ms41.2 knock tables are more relaxed for the 3.0 .
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
janithdg
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:22 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:57 pm Posts: 262 Location: Sri Lanka
|
ahmedsalem89 wrote: ahmedsalem89 wrote: janithdg wrote: what is the value you have for vehicle speed correction? I flashed ba114 Partial (328i ID41 to MS41.2 - partial) after flashing MS41.2 stock full in ba114 partial the vehicle speed correction value is 6185 Ok after changing to 1185 the problem is almost gone. There is still a little bit of difference i think i should lower it more. Can it be set to zero? Thank you janithdg, ba114 and everyone contribuiting to this forum. Edit: I set it to 685 and no it shows 190 kph while going 120 kph lol I just need to find the appropriate value. Edit 2: I don't want to flood the thread with lots of posts but now I'm getting the gearbox error to light up in the dash once a day reading error using INPA shows : 152 Engine torque reduction (DME) Error Frequency : 1 Label Byte 21 Output speed Torque Reduction EGS Plausibility --- --- --- --- Reading errors using Torque and ELM327 show: P1519 [BMW] A camshaft position actuator Bank 1 Car is 1996 E39 520 with an M52B28 swap and a Jatco auto gearbox i think you might have to re code the egs module
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mrf582
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:13 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 11:04 pm Posts: 2661 Location: RIP
|
328i-sport-rossi wrote: I have been running my MS41.2 Tune along with using the ms41.2 knock table set up.
I recently amended the knock tables to that of the ms41, i seem to now have knock.
would this suggest the ms41.2 knock tables are more relaxed for the 3.0 . It might be suggesting there are enough differences between the knock sensor noise through the block, and what the ECU determines the engine's power stroke window is as defined by the 'Window' Start and End tables. I would recommend using the same exact Knock Detection Threshold Multiplicative Factor, Window Start, and Window End as your original ECU. The rest can be whatever your preference is.
_________________ MS41 Project Leader & Co-Developer (2012 - 2023) MS41.3 https://sites.google.com/site/openms41/custom-code---ms41-3 MS41 ECU Portal https://sites.google.com/site/openms41/ms41-ecu-portal
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ET89
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 9:54 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:32 am Posts: 178 Location: Zwolle, The netherlands
|
mrf582 wrote: 328i-sport-rossi wrote: I have been running my MS41.2 Tune along with using the ms41.2 knock table set up.
I recently amended the knock tables to that of the ms41, i seem to now have knock.
would this suggest the ms41.2 knock tables are more relaxed for the 3.0 . It might be suggesting there are enough differences between the knock sensor noise through the block, and what the ECU determines the engine's power stroke window is as defined by the 'Window' Start and End tables. I would recommend using the same exact Knock Detection Threshold Multiplicative Factor, Window Start, and Window End as your original ECU. The rest can be whatever your preference is. I have experienced the same, when going from MS41.0 to MS41.2 I copied the MS41.0 knock tables. No severe knock was measured. after I went trough some non tune related issues I decided to re-write my tune on MS41.2 knock tables. measured severe knock, copied MS41.0 back again and now everything is fine.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
janithdg
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 4:44 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:57 pm Posts: 262 Location: Sri Lanka
|
|
Couldn’t there me no tables mission from knock tables, there must be an knock frequency to measure knock, I think for knock there could be more parameters which needs defining in the def
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pazi88
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2018 5:52 pm |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 12:14 pm Posts: 1042 Location: Oulu, Finland (English/Finnish)
|
janithdg wrote: Couldn’t there me no tables mission from knock tables, there must be an knock frequency to measure knock, I think for knock there could be more parameters which needs defining in the def I agree. The knock frequency is different between engines with different bore. So b20, b25/b28 and b32 should have different bandpass frequency. Not only the knock windows etc. that are curremtly defined.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
janithdg
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:06 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:57 pm Posts: 262 Location: Sri Lanka
|
pazi88 wrote: janithdg wrote: Couldn’t there me no tables mission from knock tables, there must be an knock frequency to measure knock, I think for knock there could be more parameters which needs defining in the def I agree. The knock frequency is different between engines with different bore. So b20, b25/b28 and b32 should have different bandpass frequency. Not only the knock windows etc. that are curremtly defined. so is the band pass filter a hw based or sw based?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
busterhax
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:08 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:54 pm Posts: 1774
|
|
Let’s not forget that ms41.2 knock tables were meant for 93 octane. Ms41.1 was 89.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
328i-sport-rossi
|
Post subject: Re: DEVELOPMENT : MS41.0 to MS41.2 Conversion Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:11 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 11:58 am Posts: 478
|
busterhax wrote: Let’s not forget that ms41.2 knock tables were meant for 93 octane. Ms41.1 was 89. Good point, I never really thought about this so based on that it would be an idea to make the knock tables a little more lacks as i am using 97-99 RON fuel over here.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|