|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2019 9:51 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
sda2 wrote: 323toslow wrote: sda2 wrote: Yes, it is copy & paste mistake. MS42 funktionsrahmen and code say its X*0.032
I’ve done some moderate searching off and on for the ms42 funktionsrahmen in any form, pdf, txt, anything and I haven’t come up with any links or downloads. Would someone mind sharing it with me? I didn’t have any issues finding it for my wife’s VW 1.8t running ME7.1 s4wiki is the place to look for Bosch stuff, yes  Take a look here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... WVPRzFPTEU inside the instructions.rar Thank you, will delve into that next chance I get. Bosch...ugh, this me7 is ridiculous. I was really hoping the acronyms wouldn’t be so crazy far off in relation to Siemens MS. Boy, was I wrong! Lol. Told the wife, yeah no, don’t feel like learning that crazy thing, so no turbo upgrade for you lol
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lambda1
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 7:40 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:46 pm Posts: 534
|
Quote: I’ve done some moderate searching off and on for the ms42 funktionsrahmen in any form, pdf, txt, anything and I haven’t come up with any links or downloads. Would someone mind sharing it with me?
I didn’t have any issues finding it for my wife’s VW 1.8t running ME7.1 For 1.8T ME7.x yes ... Mhm, send me PN (because some much struggle here at moment and I will forgot) I think I should have Funktionsrahmen for MS42 anywhere.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 3:59 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
Lambda1 wrote: Mhm, send me PN (because some much struggle here at moment and I will forgot) Not sure I follow what you want. PN for which?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lambda1
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 6:54 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:46 pm Posts: 534
|
|
MS42 Funktionsrahmen?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 7:02 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
Lambda1 wrote: MS42 Funktionsrahmen? Thank you for that. My current dme is: 0110AD ECU ID: 1430844
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dx4picco
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:03 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:00 pm Posts: 718 Location: Europe, France (French/English)
|
|
Has any definition been done one the MS430066 version?
I had no success opening mine in RR
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:31 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
dx4picco wrote: Has any definition been done one the MS430066 version?
I had no success opening mine in RR There is a TunerPro software definition section on ms4x.net with s/w 66 XDF. https://www.ms4x.net/index.php?title=Definition_FilesI am unsure how correct / complete it actually is though. If you want to add s/w 66 into your own RR definition file using the information from the TunerPro software XDF, it isn’t too difficult.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dx4picco
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:44 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:00 pm Posts: 718 Location: Europe, France (French/English)
|
|
I did already went through all the things on that website md was successfull opening it with that XDF. but that format is giving me headaches to find tables...
not sure how to make my own def file though.
In TunerPro software I did find many things related to ignition, vanos, fueling for cruise and WOT but nothing similar to ms41 and its acceleration/deceleration. is that normal ? does it exist on ms43 ?
I ask because the issue I'm trying to solve on a relative's car seems to come from transcient regimes (slight acceleration and slight decel, and around idle)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
323toslow
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2019 5:08 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:54 am Posts: 296 Location: Oregon, USA (English)
|
dx4picco wrote: I ask because the issue I'm trying to solve on a relative's car seems to come from transcient regimes (slight acceleration and slight decel, and around idle) Hopefully someone else can answer those questions. I’ve not messed with any ms43 vehicles aside from just diagnosing issues with INPA.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
sda2
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:15 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:59 am Posts: 103 Location: Bielefeld, GER (English)
|
|
The format is actually pretty easy to read once you are a little bit used to it.
We tried to merge the important softwareversions like 56,66 and 69 into one XML, but it was too big for Romraider and the program was unbelievably slow.
The problem with the RomRaider definitions is that it lacks many crucial constants and maps, like VO tables to name one. And more important a feature to perform a complete compare between two binaries.
Also patches can only be made to ongoing hex locations, lets say from 0x5678 to 0x5FFF and not 0x5678 - 0x56FF and 0x5F00 - 0x5FFF. Thats a pity for many patch function we already created in TunerPro software because it interferes with code segments in between.
_________________ ..:: Wiki: MS4X.net - Discord: BMW Tuning ::..
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dx4picco
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:29 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:00 pm Posts: 718 Location: Europe, France (French/English)
|
|
i'll try to learn how to decrypt these tables' names.
Anyway, is there a chance that you post a RR def with only the 66 inside ? as I may understand that it has been done in conjunction with other version.
Thank you
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pazi88
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:24 am |
|
 |
| Senior Member |
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 12:14 pm Posts: 1042 Location: Oulu, Finland (English/Finnish)
|
Changed the injector dead time conversion x*0.032 Attachment: MS43 ECU Definitions v0.9.8.xml
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Armenh7
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2019 5:25 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:04 am Posts: 5
|
|
No luck opening V37 files? I have a tuned V37 for turbo file I want to take a look at and in TunerPro software the maf limits seemed to be the same as stock so I wanted to confirm with romraider but I get an error that no ecu definition found. V56 and 66 open just fine
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lambda1
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 7:31 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:46 pm Posts: 534
|
|
Because there is no definition released out there which works fine over all, for public. If TunerPro software shows you standard values they are standard ... no need for looking in RR for.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Armenh7
|
Post subject: Re: MS43 ECU Definitions Posted: Tue May 07, 2019 4:03 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:04 am Posts: 5
|
|
I may have found an issue. The RPM values for "Idle speed drive engaged" are wrong. The definition/storage address is correct when comparing it to a TunerPro software XDF so I'm not sure where the issue lies but I thought it would be wort mentioning
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|