RomRaider Logo

RomRaider

Open Source ECU Tools
 FAQ •  Register •  Login 

RomRaider

Documentation

Community

Developers

It is currently Sat Feb 21, 2026 4:04 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:32 am 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am
Posts: 134
Location: Denver, CO
Logged a friend's car tonight, got a Learning View out of it:

Image


His is a local pro-tune, plus a lot of mods.

My question is, why are his AF #s in red and negative, while mine have always been positive and blue?

Which is better? Ideally you want them at black, within the specified range, no?

I'm guessing his Pro-tune has something to do with it vs my Cobb OTS maps, yea?

Obviously I know there is probably a huge difference in mine being a 16bit 2005 drive by throttle 2.0 engine vs his 2.5 drive by wire 2006 32bit ECU, but I still want to know about the AF numbers...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:25 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:23 am
Posts: 2565
You just want them close to zero, it doesn't matter much whether they're positive or negative.

Positive is slightly better than negative for the upper range, but as long as the number is within a couple percent of zero it doesn't matter much.

_________________
2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, BC 272, LC, FFS, OMG
Please don't send questions via PM. Post a thread and send me a link to it instead. Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:29 pm 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am
Posts: 134
Location: Denver, CO
NSFW wrote:
You just want them close to zero, it doesn't matter much whether they're positive or negative.

Positive is slightly better than negative for the upper range, but as long as the number is within a couple percent of zero it doesn't matter much.


Wow so mine being 10, 11, 12, and beyond has got to be bad... bummer.... I must be running really lean... i have no idea how to correct that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 6:15 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 367
05wrx wrote:
Wow so mine being 10, 11, 12, and beyond has got to be bad... bummer.... I must be running really lean... i have no idea how to correct that


Your car displays symptoms of a post-MAF intake leak. Under vacuum (closed loop), unmetered air is being drawn into the system, and the ECU must add fuel to compensate (positive correction numbers). In general, being with +/- 5% of 0 is "acceptable" for a custom tune, but the closer to 0, the better.

_________________
2004 WRX Wagon and 2013 STI Sedan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:29 pm 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am
Posts: 134
Location: Denver, CO
Lance Lucas wrote:
05wrx wrote:
Wow so mine being 10, 11, 12, and beyond has got to be bad... bummer.... I must be running really lean... i have no idea how to correct that


Your car displays symptoms of a post-MAF intake leak. Under vacuum (closed loop), unmetered air is being drawn into the system, and the ECU must add fuel to compensate (positive correction numbers). In general, being with +/- 5% of 0 is "acceptable" for a custom tune, but the closer to 0, the better.


Ah, interesting. Cobb tuning tried telling me that either I must have an aftermarket intake (even though ironically the SPT intake for example is almost identical to their Cobb intake, which is acceptable to use with their maps they say) or that my MAF is dirty and that is the reason for my running lean. I told them that I do not have an intake nor is my MAF dirty. I made extra sure to clean it very well, not that it was dirty to even begin with. I have run a pre-turbo boost leak check with no leaks present. I even swapped out the IC hoses with some Samco ones because I thought I had a little tear in my tb coupler. Do you think it's possible I have a leak in the post-MAF hose or the turbo inlet hose? I was looking into replacing those anyways.... unless maybe an intake would help me? I doubt it, I was just curious... because my friend up there with the 06 WRX and Pro-tune has his AF numbers in the negative, running rich slightly. My numbers are way off.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 10:15 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 367
05wrx wrote:
Ah, interesting. Cobb tuning tried telling me that either I must have an aftermarket intake (even though ironically the SPT intake for example is almost identical to their Cobb intake, which is acceptable to use with their maps they say) or that my MAF is dirty and that is the reason for my running lean. I told them that I do not have an intake nor is my MAF dirty. I made extra sure to clean it very well, not that it was dirty to even begin with. I have run a pre-turbo boost leak check with no leaks present. I even swapped out the IC hoses with some Samco ones because I thought I had a little tear in my tb coupler. Do you think it's possible I have a leak in the post-MAF hose or the turbo inlet hose? I was looking into replacing those anyways.... unless maybe an intake would help me? I doubt it, I was just curious... because my friend up there with the 06 WRX and Pro-tune has his AF numbers in the negative, running rich slightly. My numbers are way off.


A leak is certainly possible...Cobb's suggestions are in the same vain as well (erroneous/incorrect MAF readings). The turbo inlet and vacuum hoses are all subject to heat-related failure, so anything is possible. Be advised that the "A" range will wander a bit, so don't be alarmed if you see it go somewhat awry compared to the other three ranges under extended idling conditions or abnormal weather/heatsoak.

_________________
2004 WRX Wagon and 2013 STI Sedan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:08 am 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am
Posts: 134
Location: Denver, CO
Lance Lucas wrote:
A leak is certainly possible...Cobb's suggestions are in the same vain as well (erroneous/incorrect MAF readings). The turbo inlet and vacuum hoses are all subject to heat-related failure, so anything is possible. Be advised that the "A" range will wander a bit, so don't be alarmed if you see it go somewhat awry compared to the other three ranges under extended idling conditions or abnormal weather/heatsoak.


Interesting... I suppose I'll try another leak test. I wanted to get an aftermarket turbo-inlet hose anyways, maybe I actually need one now. Although I'm curious, how long is the MAF typically good for? I mean, either it works or it doesn't, right? I don't suppose there'd be any benefit to possibly replacing it? I imagine it's quite pricey... lol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:40 am 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 1054
Location: Australia
It has been shown on several occasions that running the SPT intake requires your MAF to be rescaled.

_________________

Current Car: 2002 ADM WRX STi
Current Engine: EJ207
Current Mods: X-Force 3" TBE Exhaust, GCG "bolt-on" GT3076R, APS 3" Hard Turbo Inlet, Short Ram Pod, RomRaider/ECUFlash Tune
Current Power: 248kw@wheels (332whp)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:49 am 
Offline
Experienced
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am
Posts: 134
Location: Denver, CO
wrxsti-l wrote:
It has been shown on several occasions that running the SPT intake requires your MAF to be rescaled.


That depends. This is from Cobb:

Quote:
"Our testing concluded that the SPT intake system for the 2004-2006 STi does not throw off the
MAF sensor readings. Although the 2006 WRX has a slightly larger MAF housing than the 2002-2005
WRX and we were not able to test on that particular vehicle. According to previous tests we have
performed on the 2006 WRX, we found that our standard SF intake system was not properly sized for
use with the 2006 WRX. Until further tests are completed we cannot say the SPT intake system is
compatible with a stock 2006 WRX or a 2006 WRX running our standard AccessPORT calibration"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 1054
Location: Australia
A couple of posts on NASIOC suggested different - but all good. I'd prolly check it anyhoo, only takes a long drive and the use of RomRaider Logger set on the MAF tab :)


Also, seal the intercooler piping using a block in the silicone coupler post turbo and before the manifold and then check for air leaks using an air compressor and regulator to ensure the compressed air is a few PSI above what you are going to run. All air leaks will be heard very easily :)

_________________

Current Car: 2002 ADM WRX STi
Current Engine: EJ207
Current Mods: X-Force 3" TBE Exhaust, GCG "bolt-on" GT3076R, APS 3" Hard Turbo Inlet, Short Ram Pod, RomRaider/ECUFlash Tune
Current Power: 248kw@wheels (332whp)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 5:03 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:55 am
Posts: 2
I had a stage 1 e-tune done about a month ago. Yesterday for the first time my car threw a CEL at WOT in 5th gear.

During the last iteration of my e-tune (a month ago), the learning view showed IAM of 1, A/F learning 1 all very close to 0 (one .1 the rest 0) and all 0 for the fine learning table.

However after pulling another learning view this morning it looks like below.

Is this just a case of too few tuning iterations? Is monitoring the learning view long term (in terms of time after an ecu reset) just as important as monitoring it after a reset and a WOT pull?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:09 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:23 am
Posts: 2565
Who was your tuner, Sabotaged?

_________________
2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, BC 272, LC, FFS, OMG
Please don't send questions via PM. Post a thread and send me a link to it instead. Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 9:22 am 
Offline
Newbie

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:55 am
Posts: 2
Infamous1 over at legacygt.com forums. I haven't contacted him yet. Just trying to get a bit of info first.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 1:33 pm 
Offline
RomRaider Donator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:40 pm
Posts: 211
Location: Colorado
sabotaged wrote:
I had a stage 1 e-tune done about a month ago. Yesterday for the first time my car threw a CEL at WOT in 5th gear.

During the last iteration of my e-tune (a month ago), the learning view showed IAM of 1, A/F learning 1 all very close to 0 (one .1 the rest 0) and all 0 for the fine learning table.

However after pulling another learning view this morning it looks like below.

Is this just a case of too few tuning iterations? Is monitoring the learning view long term (in terms of time after an ecu reset) just as important as monitoring it after a reset and a WOT pull?


Let your tuner know. I'm sure he will take care of you. It's probably almost all fuel related since your AFR has wandered to almost -5%. Now that you have good LV info (AFR D, namely), that should be a pretty easy fix. What intake are you running? Your AFR D needs to be rescaled to prevent you from running leaner than intended. That out to clean up a lot of your FLKC.

_________________
'05 LGT, BNR68+E85


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 6:28 pm 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:32 am
Posts: 3040
The CEL has nothing to do with knock.

It's an overboost CEL. The boost control in 5th gear wasn't controlled.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Style based on FI Subsilver by phpBBservice.nl