|
RomRaider
Documentation
Community
Developers
|
| Author |
Message |
|
05wrx
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:32 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am Posts: 134 Location: Denver, CO
|
Logged a friend's car tonight, got a Learning View out of it:  His is a local pro-tune, plus a lot of mods. My question is, why are his AF #s in red and negative, while mine have always been positive and blue? Which is better? Ideally you want them at black, within the specified range, no? I'm guessing his Pro-tune has something to do with it vs my Cobb OTS maps, yea? Obviously I know there is probably a huge difference in mine being a 16bit 2005 drive by throttle 2.0 engine vs his 2.5 drive by wire 2006 32bit ECU, but I still want to know about the AF numbers...
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
nsfw
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:25 pm |
|
 |
| Moderator |
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:23 am Posts: 2565
|
|
You just want them close to zero, it doesn't matter much whether they're positive or negative.
Positive is slightly better than negative for the upper range, but as long as the number is within a couple percent of zero it doesn't matter much.
_________________ 2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, BC 272, LC, FFS, OMG Please don't send questions via PM. Post a thread and send me a link to it instead. Thanks!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
05wrx
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 5:29 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am Posts: 134 Location: Denver, CO
|
NSFW wrote: You just want them close to zero, it doesn't matter much whether they're positive or negative.
Positive is slightly better than negative for the upper range, but as long as the number is within a couple percent of zero it doesn't matter much. Wow so mine being 10, 11, 12, and beyond has got to be bad... bummer.... I must be running really lean... i have no idea how to correct that
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lance Lucas
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 6:15 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 367
|
05wrx wrote: Wow so mine being 10, 11, 12, and beyond has got to be bad... bummer.... I must be running really lean... i have no idea how to correct that Your car displays symptoms of a post-MAF intake leak. Under vacuum (closed loop), unmetered air is being drawn into the system, and the ECU must add fuel to compensate (positive correction numbers). In general, being with +/- 5% of 0 is "acceptable" for a custom tune, but the closer to 0, the better.
_________________ 2004 WRX Wagon and 2013 STI Sedan
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
05wrx
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 9:29 pm |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am Posts: 134 Location: Denver, CO
|
Lance Lucas wrote: 05wrx wrote: Wow so mine being 10, 11, 12, and beyond has got to be bad... bummer.... I must be running really lean... i have no idea how to correct that Your car displays symptoms of a post-MAF intake leak. Under vacuum (closed loop), unmetered air is being drawn into the system, and the ECU must add fuel to compensate (positive correction numbers). In general, being with +/- 5% of 0 is "acceptable" for a custom tune, but the closer to 0, the better. Ah, interesting. Cobb tuning tried telling me that either I must have an aftermarket intake (even though ironically the SPT intake for example is almost identical to their Cobb intake, which is acceptable to use with their maps they say) or that my MAF is dirty and that is the reason for my running lean. I told them that I do not have an intake nor is my MAF dirty. I made extra sure to clean it very well, not that it was dirty to even begin with. I have run a pre-turbo boost leak check with no leaks present. I even swapped out the IC hoses with some Samco ones because I thought I had a little tear in my tb coupler. Do you think it's possible I have a leak in the post-MAF hose or the turbo inlet hose? I was looking into replacing those anyways.... unless maybe an intake would help me? I doubt it, I was just curious... because my friend up there with the 06 WRX and Pro-tune has his AF numbers in the negative, running rich slightly. My numbers are way off.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lance Lucas
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 10:15 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:10 pm Posts: 367
|
05wrx wrote: Ah, interesting. Cobb tuning tried telling me that either I must have an aftermarket intake (even though ironically the SPT intake for example is almost identical to their Cobb intake, which is acceptable to use with their maps they say) or that my MAF is dirty and that is the reason for my running lean. I told them that I do not have an intake nor is my MAF dirty. I made extra sure to clean it very well, not that it was dirty to even begin with. I have run a pre-turbo boost leak check with no leaks present. I even swapped out the IC hoses with some Samco ones because I thought I had a little tear in my tb coupler. Do you think it's possible I have a leak in the post-MAF hose or the turbo inlet hose? I was looking into replacing those anyways.... unless maybe an intake would help me? I doubt it, I was just curious... because my friend up there with the 06 WRX and Pro-tune has his AF numbers in the negative, running rich slightly. My numbers are way off. A leak is certainly possible...Cobb's suggestions are in the same vain as well (erroneous/incorrect MAF readings). The turbo inlet and vacuum hoses are all subject to heat-related failure, so anything is possible. Be advised that the "A" range will wander a bit, so don't be alarmed if you see it go somewhat awry compared to the other three ranges under extended idling conditions or abnormal weather/heatsoak.
_________________ 2004 WRX Wagon and 2013 STI Sedan
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
05wrx
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:08 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am Posts: 134 Location: Denver, CO
|
Lance Lucas wrote: A leak is certainly possible...Cobb's suggestions are in the same vain as well (erroneous/incorrect MAF readings). The turbo inlet and vacuum hoses are all subject to heat-related failure, so anything is possible. Be advised that the "A" range will wander a bit, so don't be alarmed if you see it go somewhat awry compared to the other three ranges under extended idling conditions or abnormal weather/heatsoak. Interesting... I suppose I'll try another leak test. I wanted to get an aftermarket turbo-inlet hose anyways, maybe I actually need one now. Although I'm curious, how long is the MAF typically good for? I mean, either it works or it doesn't, right? I don't suppose there'd be any benefit to possibly replacing it? I imagine it's quite pricey... lol
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
wrxsti-l
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:40 am |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
 |
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:49 am Posts: 1054 Location: Australia
|
|
It has been shown on several occasions that running the SPT intake requires your MAF to be rescaled.
_________________
Current Car: 2002 ADM WRX STi Current Engine: EJ207 Current Mods: X-Force 3" TBE Exhaust, GCG "bolt-on" GT3076R, APS 3" Hard Turbo Inlet, Short Ram Pod, RomRaider/ECUFlash Tune Current Power: 248kw@wheels (332whp)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
05wrx
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 7:49 am |
|
 |
| Experienced |
 |
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:49 am Posts: 134 Location: Denver, CO
|
wrxsti-l wrote: It has been shown on several occasions that running the SPT intake requires your MAF to be rescaled. That depends. This is from Cobb: Quote: "Our testing concluded that the SPT intake system for the 2004-2006 STi does not throw off the MAF sensor readings. Although the 2006 WRX has a slightly larger MAF housing than the 2002-2005 WRX and we were not able to test on that particular vehicle. According to previous tests we have performed on the 2006 WRX, we found that our standard SF intake system was not properly sized for use with the 2006 WRX. Until further tests are completed we cannot say the SPT intake system is compatible with a stock 2006 WRX or a 2006 WRX running our standard AccessPORT calibration"
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
wrxsti-l
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 12:42 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
 |
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:49 am Posts: 1054 Location: Australia
|
A couple of posts on NASIOC suggested different - but all good. I'd prolly check it anyhoo, only takes a long drive and the use of RomRaider Logger set on the MAF tab  Also, seal the intercooler piping using a block in the silicone coupler post turbo and before the manifold and then check for air leaks using an air compressor and regulator to ensure the compressed air is a few PSI above what you are going to run. All air leaks will be heard very easily 
_________________
Current Car: 2002 ADM WRX STi Current Engine: EJ207 Current Mods: X-Force 3" TBE Exhaust, GCG "bolt-on" GT3076R, APS 3" Hard Turbo Inlet, Short Ram Pod, RomRaider/ECUFlash Tune Current Power: 248kw@wheels (332whp)
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
sabotaged
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 5:03 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:55 am Posts: 2
|
|
I had a stage 1 e-tune done about a month ago. Yesterday for the first time my car threw a CEL at WOT in 5th gear.
During the last iteration of my e-tune (a month ago), the learning view showed IAM of 1, A/F learning 1 all very close to 0 (one .1 the rest 0) and all 0 for the fine learning table.
However after pulling another learning view this morning it looks like below.
Is this just a case of too few tuning iterations? Is monitoring the learning view long term (in terms of time after an ecu reset) just as important as monitoring it after a reset and a WOT pull?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
nsfw
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:09 am |
|
 |
| Moderator |
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:23 am Posts: 2565
|
|
Who was your tuner, Sabotaged?
_________________ 2005 Legacy GT w/ ATP 3076, IWG, MBC, BCS, BC 272, LC, FFS, OMG Please don't send questions via PM. Post a thread and send me a link to it instead. Thanks!
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
sabotaged
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 9:22 am |
|
 |
| Newbie |
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:55 am Posts: 2
|
|
Infamous1 over at legacygt.com forums. I haven't contacted him yet. Just trying to get a bit of info first.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Guy on the corner
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 1:33 pm |
|
 |
| RomRaider Donator |
 |
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:40 pm Posts: 211 Location: Colorado
|
sabotaged wrote: I had a stage 1 e-tune done about a month ago. Yesterday for the first time my car threw a CEL at WOT in 5th gear.
During the last iteration of my e-tune (a month ago), the learning view showed IAM of 1, A/F learning 1 all very close to 0 (one .1 the rest 0) and all 0 for the fine learning table.
However after pulling another learning view this morning it looks like below.
Is this just a case of too few tuning iterations? Is monitoring the learning view long term (in terms of time after an ecu reset) just as important as monitoring it after a reset and a WOT pull? Let your tuner know. I'm sure he will take care of you. It's probably almost all fuel related since your AFR has wandered to almost -5%. Now that you have good LV info (AFR D, namely), that should be a pretty easy fix. What intake are you running? Your AFR D needs to be rescaled to prevent you from running leaner than intended. That out to clean up a lot of your FLKC.
_________________ '05 LGT, BNR68+E85
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mickeyd2005
|
Post subject: Re: Subaru's knock control strategy explained Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 6:28 pm |
|
 |
| Administrator |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:32 am Posts: 3040
|
|
The CEL has nothing to do with knock.
It's an overboost CEL. The boost control in 5th gear wasn't controlled.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|